A bite of the pie: Indiana Supreme Court says wagering taxes stay deducted
A bite of the pie: Indiana Supreme Court says wagering taxes stay deducted
October 13, 2026
United States
United States
United States
The Indiana Supreme Court unanimously held that Penn Entertainment was not required to add back wagering taxes it paid to other states when computing its Indiana taxable income. In the latest episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor slice up the decision in Penn Entertainment v. Indiana Department of Revenue, an opinion that is as much about apportionment and tax policy as it is about add-backs. They walk through the court's pie-chart explanation of "double apportionment," its step-by-step framework for deciding whether another state's tax is "based on" or "measured by" income, and what the ruling may mean for taxpayers in other states with similar add-back language.
They also keep a running tally of the pie puns and tackle an overrated/underrated debate on food trucks.
The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website.