South Africa's new merger notification thresholds: Key considerations
May 11, 2026
South Africa's new merger notification thresholds: Key considerationsMay 11, 2026 The Department of Trade, Industry, and Competition ("DTIC") has implemented new merger notification thresholds which determine whether a merger is classified as 'small', 'intermediate', or 'large', and has increased its filing fees. In terms of section 13A(1) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, the Competition Commission (the “Commission”) must be notified of mergers qualifying as intermediate or large. Section 13A(3) stipulates that parties may not implement an intermediate or large merger until it has been approved by the Commission. Small mergers are generally exempt from mandatory notification requirements. However, parties should note that the Commission retains the authority to request notification within six months following implementation where it considers that the merger may substantially lessen competition or cannot be justified on public interest grounds. The current thresholds and filing fees for intermediate and large mergers, compared to the previous thresholds, are set out below:
Rationale for the Revised ThresholdsThe previous merger notification thresholds were last revised in 2017. In the intervening period, inflationary pressures have resulted in numerous transactions exceeding the notification thresholds despite presenting no substantive competitive concerns. This has given rise to several difficulties:
The DTIC has recognised that updating the thresholds will benefit businesses, regulators, and the broader economy. The increased thresholds mean that a fair number of transactions will now fall into the 'small' merger category and will not require notification. For merging parties, this has several benefits:
Certain transactions that would have previously qualified as large mergers (requiring Competition Tribunal approval) are now reclassified as intermediate mergers, which is reviewed by the Commission alone. This will result in expedited approval processes and a reduced administrative burden for the Competition Tribunal. Implications for the MarketThese amendments are expected to have a positive impact on the South African market:
It should be noted that the Method for Calculation set out in Part B of the General Notice 1254 of 2017 (Government Notice No. 41245 of 10 November 2017) remains unchanged. Latest InsightsLatest News
Latest Events
legal updates July 22, 2026 Size matters: when a stationery cupboard joke turns costly legal updates July 20, 2026 Industrials Unpacked #1: Supply Chain Contracts legal updates July 17, 2026 EU Forced Labour Regulation legal updates July 16, 2026 Trump v Slaughter: What the US Supreme Court’s ruling means for transatlant... firm news July 10, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises OCBC on the landmark secondary dual listing of... client news July 10, 2026 Setting sail: Eversheds Sutherland advises senior management of D-Marin on ... client news July 09, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Costello Medical on transition to employee own... firm news July 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland lands lateral partner-led Paris Funds team, as its wid... virtual UAE - Employment law in the Dubai International Financial Centre September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.30pm (GMT) Virtual in-person Managing AI use in the workplace: what every UK HR team needs to know September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.00pm (BST) London, United Kingdom in-person Basic foundations of US employment law September 17, 2026 9.30am - 4.30pm (GMT) London, United Kingdom in-person 2026 BDC Roundtable September 23, 2026 Washington DC, United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||