Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecution
Tax - The One Pager
April 15, 2025
Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecutionTax - The One PagerApril 15, 2025 One of the most covered German tax scandals were the infamous cum-ex cases which resulted in numerous criminal convictions in recent years. Just recently public prosecutor’s offices across the nation shifted focus to cum-cum share deals and cum-cum/cum-ex variants involving primarily foreign investors. In March 2025, the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court allowed the public prosecution to bring charges against former managers of Deutsche Pfandbriefbank for tax evasion through cum-cum transactions. The tax loss in the case of cum-cum is considered times higher than cum-ex. Financial experts have estimated additional taxes of approx. 28.5 billion EUR. No wonder new investigation units and task forces at public prosecutor level are being established dedicated to holding investor and intermediates liable. StructureThere are many types of cum-cum structures ("dividend stripping"). In a nutshell, the idea is that foreign taxpayers avoid the full tax burden in Germany by transferring shares to domestic taxpayers shortly before the dividend record date. The domestic taxpayer is entitled to a capital gainer tax credit or refund, typically a local bank or other institution as domestic tax resident. Once the dividend has been paid out, it is transferred back to the foreign investor. Legal backgroundBy circular dated 9 July 2021 (BStBl 2021 I p. 995), the German tax authorities indicated to deem cum-cum-deals as abuse. A conviction for cum-cum by a criminal court has not yet taken place. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court has only ruled on the initiation of court proceedings. In light of the cum-ex convictions individuals face long prison sentences and financial institutions face high fines and the confiscation of any profits. Risks and opportunities for financial institutionsWe expect that financial institutions involved in cum-cum deals will be targeted by public prosecutors and tax authorities. Companies should therefore be prepared for investigations. On the one hand, this includes preparation of all employees for dawn raids. On the other hand, consideration should be given to clarifying the facts through internal investigations and examining whether a voluntary disclosure is necessary to minimise the risks. Key take-awaysFinancial institutions should therefore:
Latest Insights
Latest News
Latest Events
legal updates September 17, 2026 A domestic place of posting as an organisational unit eligible for a works ... legal updates September 16, 2026 Germany: No inflation adjustments during parental leave – Federal Labour Co... legal updates September 16, 2026 Commercially Connected shorts - 16 September 2026 legal updates September 15, 2026 CMA places public procurement at the centre of its growth agenda client news September 21, 2026 All change: Eversheds Sutherland advises DfT on Chiltern Railways transitio... deal alerts September 07, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Finkemeier Holding on capital increase in egge... firm news August 26, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens top-ranked pensions practice with appointm... client news August 13, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises H.I.G. Capital on investment in Phoenix ME in-person 2026 BDC Roundtable September 23, 2026 Washington DC, United States virtual Employment law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia September 29, 2026 9.30am - 12.30pm (BST) Virtual virtual Energy Transition Series: Energy Transition and Pricing Volatility October 08, 2026 10:00 ET | 15:00 BST | 16:00 CET in-person Labor relations conference - turning legal change into workplace reality October 08, 2026 10.00am - 4.00pm (BST) London, United Kingdom |