Invalidity of the Fixed-Term Reason "Replacement" in Case of Foreseeable Incapacity of the Substitute*
Federal Labour Court (BAG) of 12 June 2024 - 7 AZR 188/23
November 04, 2024
Invalidity of the Fixed-Term Reason "Replacement" in Case of Foreseeable Incapacity of the Substitute*Federal Labour Court (BAG) of 12 June 2024 - 7 AZR 188/23November 04, 2024 The employer can only invoke the objective reason "to replace another employee" in accordance with Section 14 (1) sentence 2 no. 3 of the Part-Time Fixed-Term Employment Act (TzBfG) if the employee is employed to actually replace another employee. If it is already clear when the contract is concluded that the substitute* will not be able to perform the work owed by him/her for the entire duration of the fixed-term employment contract due to incapacity to work and the employer is aware of this, the objective reason for the replacement may be pretextual and the fixed term may be invalid. Facts of the caseThe employee was employed as a parcel deliverer on the basis of a fixed-term employment contract until 30 April 2022. Shortly before this fixed-term contract expired, on 23 April 2022, the employee informed the responsible branch manager that he was in hospital due to an umbilical hernia, needed an operation and would therefore be absent for the time being. On 25 April 2022, the employee sent the employer his certificate of incapacity for work up to and including 8 May 2022; the parties then concluded a fixed-term employment contract from 1 to 28 May 2022. The reason for the fixed-term contract was "replacement due to temporary absence" of four other parcel delivery staff of the employer who were on holiday during the fixed-term period. Ultimately, the employee was unable to work throughout this period and submitted corresponding follow-up certificates. The decisionThe Federal Labour Court ruled that a fixed-term agreement is invalid due to "substitution" if the employer already knew when the contract was concluded that the substitute would be unable to work for the entire duration of the contract. However, the company may rely on the information provided in a properly issued certificate of incapacity for work. In the specific case, the BAG therefore considered the time limit to be effective, as the employer could not foresee the complete incapacity to work of the substitute. Consequences for practiceAlthough the BAG's decision is hardly surprising, it admonishes the employer to carefully and conscientiously examine the specific individual case. If a fixed term without objective grounds is inadmissible and there is also no effective reason for the fixed term, the employment contract is deemed to have been concluded for an indefinite period. Practical tipIf the company wishes to employ an employee on a fixed-term basis, it should therefore always ensure that there is an objective reason for the fixed term or that a fixed term without objective reason is permissible; the fixed-term agreement must also be signed by both parties in order to be valid. Key contacts
Latest Insights
Latest News
Latest Events
firm news July 10, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises OCBC on the landmark secondary dual listing of... client news July 10, 2026 Setting sail: Eversheds Sutherland advises senior management of D-Marin on ... client news July 09, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Costello Medical on transition to employee own... firm news July 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland lands lateral partner-led Paris Funds team, as its wid... virtual UAE - Employment law in the Dubai International Financial Centre September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.30pm (GMT) Virtual in-person Managing AI use in the workplace: what every UK HR team needs to know September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.00pm (BST) London, United Kingdom in-person Basic foundations of US employment law September 17, 2026 9.30am - 4.30pm (GMT) London, United Kingdom in-person 2026 BDC Roundtable September 23, 2026 Washington DC, United States |