Ch. 7 Ruling Is Warning For Merchant Cash Advance Providers
Court ruling recharacterizes MCA agreements as loans, exposing funders to multi-million-dollar preference liability.
July 18, 2025
Ch. 7 Ruling Is Warning For Merchant Cash Advance ProvidersCourt ruling recharacterizes MCA agreements as loans, exposing funders to multi-million-dollar preference liability.July 18, 2025 Law360 A recent bankruptcy court ruling in In re: JPR Mechanical Inc. delivers a major warning to MCA providers: labels won’t protect you if your agreement looks like a loan. The court ordered a provider to return over $3 million in payments after recharacterizing its contracts as disguised debt. This decision underscores the growing risk of preference exposure, especially when reconciliation terms are weak or procedural missteps occur. With courts increasingly focused on economic substance over form, MCA funders should take note. Read the full analysis to see what this means for your contracts, litigation strategy, and compliance risk. Latest News
Latest Eventsclient news September 21, 2026 All change: Eversheds Sutherland advises DfT on Chiltern Railways transitio... firm news September 04, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Baird Capital on the sale of Vega Global to FO... firm news August 26, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens top-ranked pensions practice with appointm... client news August 13, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises H.I.G. Capital on investment in Phoenix ME |